Skip to main content

Critical Realism and Socialist Realism- George Luckacs

Critical Realism and Socialist Realism: George Luckacs


For the modern world, George Luckacs discusses two forms of realism,  Critical Realism and Socialist Realism. The theory of Critical Realism says that the bourgeois intellectual still has a positive role to play. In 1955 George Luckacs wote:
The real dilemma of our age is not the opposition between Capitalism and Socialism, but the opposition between peace and war. The first duty of the bourgeois intellectual has become the rejection of an all prevailing fatalistic angst, implying a rescue operation for humanity rather than any break through Socialism.



Against this perspective he sees as politically the most important task the building of a peace movement in which all ideological tendencies merge and artistically the contribution of the great tradition of the Nineteenth century Liberal novel. The hero of his phrase is Thomas Mann, compare to Gothe for his concern with the 'totality of human relationship. Mann, with his development from purely unpolitical stance to his courage opposition to Hitler, fits the popular front paradigm perfectly. All that critical realism need to do is to show ' Readyness to respect the perspective of Socialism.' 

The Concept of Socialist Realism:

The Concept of Socialist Realism is a more sensitive one for Luckacs than it was for Lhdanov. Nonetheless  it implies the same basic conservatism. At worst, it is the realism of the accepted fact, the glorification of what is at the expense of what might be. In the essay 'Solzhenitsym and the new Realism', Luckacs attacks the art of the stalin era as naturalism, not realism. But his praise is reserved for the portrayal of, 'A being of whose humanity nothing could destroy or disfigure'. 

Thus,neither Critical nor Socialist Realism goes beyond the limits of Liberal Humanism. What Luckacs leaves out his picture is the writer who is revolutionary both in his conscious acceptance of Marxism and his treatment of literary form, who tries to write from the stand point of the working class and its new modes of struggle. Luckacs I'm his very salutary concern for totality tends to concentrate on those writers who achieve complete totality within their work, in a harmonious construction rather than than those who strive towards totality while engaged in struggle. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Biographia Literaria: Analysis of Fancy and Imagination

Biographia Literaria: Analysis of Coldridge's Fancy and Imagination
The Term Fancy and ImaginationDuring the 17th century, the term 'Imagination' and 'fancy' has often enough been used in a vaguely synonymous way to refer to the realm of facing tale or make belief. Yet here and there the term 'Imagination'  had tended to distinguish itself from fancy and settled towards a meaning centred in the sober literalism of sense impression and the survival of these in memory. Such is the distinction between imagination and fancy. 


Imagination and fancy in Biographia literaria Coldridge differed from Wordsworth in his aim and purpose, he was more preoccupied with the psychological process which the imaginative creations becomes more vitally important than the poems themselves. Although Coldridge has been expected as the more articulate and theoretical sportsmen between the two poets, Coldridge  has attributed to his own belief to the poetical practice of Wordsworth. A…

Paradise lost: Satan as the Hero of John Milton

Paradise lost: Satan as the Hero of John Milton 

Qualities of a HeroThe hero, as a rule, must be the central figure in the epic and the epic must be about him and his exploits. Moreover, apart from being sacrificing and altruistic, he must have a number of heroic qualities as physical courage, fearlessness, skill in the use of arms, intelligent, foresight, determination and persistence. Whether Satan is the hero of Paradise Lost or not depends on the presence of the above mentioned qualities in him. However to determine it, it is imperative to analyse deep into his character in order to look for the heroic qualities in him. 


The Idea of Satan as the Hero of Paradise LostThere can be no gained saying the fact that Satan is the hero of Paradise Lost, in-so-far as Book I and Book II are concerned. He dominates the first two books and towers head shoulders above in companions. He has a huge bulls like a Zeviathan, his shield has a circumference as blood as that of the Moon, and his spear is…

King Lear: Analysis of the Fool, Storm and Reconciliation Scene

King Lear:Analysis of the Fool, Storm and Reconciliation Scene

King Lear - The FoolKing Lear is the only play in which as Fool has been introduce by Shakespeare. The fool use to be a professional jester or clown whose function was to amuse the king by his jokes an witty remarks. The Fool enjoy a good deal of freedom to speak on any subject without any restraint. The object in introducing the Fool seems to have been to provide comic relief in the play. The Fool in King Lear has perhaps evoke much criticism than any other character in the play. The Fool comments at the Lear dignity from a kind of chronic counter part which add a depth any complexity to this tragic play. The first mention of the Fool comes when Lear who is pending his first month after giving a way. His entire Kingdom to his daughter, when he ask one of his Knights:
Where is my knave? My Fool, Go you and called my Fool Trither.
The Knight reply that, since Cordelia, departure from France, the Fool has much pined away. The r…