Skip to main content

Restoration Period or Age of Dryden - Brief description

Restoration Period or Age of Dryden 

The period from 1660 to 1700 is known as the Restoration Period or the Age of Dryden. The English people were fed up with the restraints of the Puritan regime which denied to them all entertainments even of the most innocent kind. Prince Charles who had sought shelter in France, was invited to occupy the throne of his father. He was restored to the English throne in 1660 and became king Charles II of England. The Restoration of Charles II marked the beginning of a new era both in life send literature. Charles II brought with him refinement and Culture of the French, as well as the immortality and profligacy of the French Court. He also brought with him French literary influence. It marked the beginning of that Neo-Classicism or Pseudo-Classicism which was to dominate English Literature for next one hundred and fifty years. 

Restoration Period: English Literature 

The literature of the period reflected the spirit of the Age. Corruption, Moral Laxity, Rampant during this period are reflected in literature. The following tendencies distinguish the literature of the period :

1. Rise of the Neo-Classicism: 

The Restoration marked a complete break with the past. The people believed in the present, the real and the material. Ideas of conduct were set up in accordance with reason and common sense. 
Rules and literary conventions became more important than the depth and seriousness of subject matter to the writers of this period. They expressed superficial manners and customs of the urban aristocratic life and did not delve deep into the mysteries of human mind and hearts. They turned to the ancient writers for guidance and inspiration. Thus, grew up the Neo-Classical school of poetry. The Neo-Classicist could not sear to great heights of imagination, instead directed attention to slavish imitation. 

2. Imitation of France : 

The Restoration era was  an era of France influence both in literature and social life. The famous French Writers - Corneille, Racine, and Boileau were imitated. Boileau's 'Good Sense' ideal became very popular. English writers learned to look for guidance of the French writers and their styles like - lucidity, veracity. 

3. Correctness: 

The literary works of the Restoration Period were imitative and of limited quality. They lacked creativity and fight of imagination. They abandoned freedom of expression and slavishly followed the rules which can be summarized as 'Be Correct'. Correctness means avoidance of enthusiasm, moderate opinions, strict care and accuracy in poetic techniques. 

4. Realism and Formalism: 

Restoration literature is realistic and urban. It was mainly concerned with life in London and details of dress, fashion and manners. The Restoration writers sought to point realistic pictures of corrupt court and society, and emphasised vices rather than virtues. 

5.  Directness and Simplicity of Expression : 

The Restoration writers eschewed all extravagances of thought and language and aimed at achieving directness and simplicity of expression. To reform English prose, the Royal Society get rid of 'Swellings of style' and adopted the use of naked, natural way of speaking. 


In Conclusion, imitation of the ancient, imitation of the French, the correct school, Realism, directness and simplicity of expression marked the salient features of the Restoration Literature. 


Popular posts from this blog

Biographia Literaria: Analysis of Fancy and Imagination

Biographia Literaria: Analysis of Coldridge's Fancy and Imagination
The Term Fancy and ImaginationDuring the 17th century, the term 'Imagination' and 'fancy' has often enough been used in a vaguely synonymous way to refer to the realm of facing tale or make belief. Yet here and there the term 'Imagination'  had tended to distinguish itself from fancy and settled towards a meaning centred in the sober literalism of sense impression and the survival of these in memory. Such is the distinction between imagination and fancy. 

Imagination and fancy in Biographia literaria Coldridge differed from Wordsworth in his aim and purpose, he was more preoccupied with the psychological process which the imaginative creations becomes more vitally important than the poems themselves. Although Coldridge has been expected as the more articulate and theoretical sportsmen between the two poets, Coldridge  has attributed to his own belief to the poetical practice of Wordsworth. A…

Paradise lost: Satan as the Hero of John Milton

Paradise lost: Satan as the Hero of John Milton 

Qualities of a HeroThe hero, as a rule, must be the central figure in the epic and the epic must be about him and his exploits. Moreover, apart from being sacrificing and altruistic, he must have a number of heroic qualities as physical courage, fearlessness, skill in the use of arms, intelligent, foresight, determination and persistence. Whether Satan is the hero of Paradise Lost or not depends on the presence of the above mentioned qualities in him. However to determine it, it is imperative to analyse deep into his character in order to look for the heroic qualities in him. 

The Idea of Satan as the Hero of Paradise LostThere can be no gained saying the fact that Satan is the hero of Paradise Lost, in-so-far as Book I and Book II are concerned. He dominates the first two books and towers head shoulders above in companions. He has a huge bulls like a Zeviathan, his shield has a circumference as blood as that of the Moon, and his spear is…

King Lear: Analysis of the Fool, Storm and Reconciliation Scene

King Lear:Analysis of the Fool, Storm and Reconciliation Scene

King Lear - The FoolKing Lear is the only play in which as Fool has been introduce by Shakespeare. The fool use to be a professional jester or clown whose function was to amuse the king by his jokes an witty remarks. The Fool enjoy a good deal of freedom to speak on any subject without any restraint. The object in introducing the Fool seems to have been to provide comic relief in the play. The Fool in King Lear has perhaps evoke much criticism than any other character in the play. The Fool comments at the Lear dignity from a kind of chronic counter part which add a depth any complexity to this tragic play. The first mention of the Fool comes when Lear who is pending his first month after giving a way. His entire Kingdom to his daughter, when he ask one of his Knights:
Where is my knave? My Fool, Go you and called my Fool Trither.
The Knight reply that, since Cordelia, departure from France, the Fool has much pined away. The r…